Reading Notes

“The creator’s pattern”:
Two conclusions have been summarized in the article, one is the raid upon those creators’childhood. The other is those creators’ assupmtion and to attempt to strike out on one’s own as much as possible. However, whether those can be concluded as a feature or characteristic of the event of creativity shall be highly doubted.Are those specific examples representative enough to support common feature in all those creative people?

“Design protocol data and novel design decisions
“:
Author in this article has tried to devise a method to measure people’s creativity, which is a delicately designed. However, I feel confused about the exactness of result in this method.The  subjects’ background  are various(such as age, experience influence etc.) and can have a great influence on the test result.
There is also problem existing between  the measurement of creativity in design-related field and maths/statics field. If someone is doing innovation in maths. Is drawing still the primary method to faciliate he/she in finding the creative solution?

“Environments for Creativity-a lab for making things“:
The projects presented in this paper are awesome.Relating to creativity education, there is so much exploration.This paper talks about the combination of both “idea” and “execute” capability in creativity education, raising my curiosity of direction in which future creative course will go. Creative education is trying to combine the power of engineer and designer together, however, who is more dominated in a creative project?

The creator’s pattern question:
Two conclusions have been summarized in

the article, one is the raid upon those

creators’childhood. The other is those

creators’ assupmtion and to attempt to

strike out on one’s own as much as

possible. However, whether those can be

concluded as a feature or characteristic

of the event of creativity shall be highly

doubted.Are those specific examples

representative enough to support common

feature in all those creative people?

Design protocol data and novel design

decisions
Author in this article has tried to devise

a method to measure people’s creativity,

which is a delicately designed. However, I

feel confused about the exactness of

result in this method.The  subjects’

background  are various(such as age,

experience influence etc.) and can have a

great influence on the test result.
There is also problem existing between

the measurement of creativity in design-

related field and maths/statics field. If

someone is doing innovation in maths. Is

drawing still the primary method to

faciliate he/she in finding the creative

solution?

Environments for Creativity-a lab for

making things
The projects presented in this paper are

awesome.Relating to creativity education,

there is so much exploration.This paper

talks about the combination of both “idea”

and “execute” capability in creativity

education, raising my curiosity of

direction in which future creative course

will go.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: